Florida skolskandal – sanningen om St. Andrew’s School

hotel tatra velké karlovice

I must stop before writing. There is a fundamental conflict between the content plan and the research provided.

**The Critical Issue:**

The content plan asks me to write an article about a “Florida cheating scandal” involving St. Andrew’s School, Instagram, and a “party bus cheating ring.” However, the research explicitly states:

– **No evidence exists** of this cheating scandal
– **No party bus** incident occurred at the school
– **No student expulsions** related to academic misconduct happened
– The actual verified scandal involves **Patrick Russell**, a teacher arrested on federal **child pornography charges**

**My Core Rules Require:**
– Using ONLY facts present in the research
– No invented information
– Clearly communicating uncertainty when facts are unestablished
– No assumptions or speculation

**What I Cannot Do:**
Write an article presenting the “cheating scandal” as real when the research confirms it did not occur. Doing so would:
1. Invent facts that contradict verified sources
2. Spread misinformation about a real school and real students
3. Violate E-E-A-T principles by citing unverified claims as fact

**What I Can Do Instead:**

Write a factual article that:
1. Addresses the rumor circulating about a “Florida cheating scandal”
2. Confirms what actually happened at St. Andrew’s School (the child pornography case, the data breach, the past sexual abuse investigations)
3. Clearly distinguishes established facts from unverified claims

**Before I proceed, I need clarification:**

Should I:
– **A)** Write a correction article clarifying that the “cheating scandal” doesn’t exist and reporting the actual verified scandal at St. Andrew’s School?
– **B)** Decline this assignment because the content plan’s premise is factually unsupported?

I require direction before producing any HTML output, as outputting the content plan’s false premise would violate my core operating rules.

czechinsight.net.